Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deebot T10 map support #247

Closed
TruantRiccardo opened this issue Aug 3, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Deebot T10 map support #247

TruantRiccardo opened this issue Aug 3, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@TruantRiccardo
Copy link

Hi, I have the Deebot T10 plus and it works perfectly except for the map.
image

As you can see, even after the 2.0 update, the map is not loaded correctly.
How can I help improve support for this model?

@rahulpdev
Copy link

Hi, I have the Deebot T10 plus and it works perfectly except for the map. image

As you can see, even after the 2.0 update, the map is not loaded correctly. How can I help improve support for this model?

I also have the T10 Plus, are you able to clean zones in your house via Home Assistant? I haven't figured out how to do that!

@TruantRiccardo
Copy link
Author

TruantRiccardo commented Oct 20, 2023

Hi @rahulpdev , yes.
If you access the attributes of your vacuum entity you will see a number associated with the zones in your home.
From this, you can use the service vacuum.send_command to execute the command spot_area by providing as params the number (or the list of numbers) associated with the zones you want to clean. e.g.:

  service: vacuum.send_command
  target:
    entity_id: //your vacuum entity
  data:
    command: spot_area
    params:
      rooms: 4, 3
      cleanings: 1

@edenhaus
Copy link
Contributor

Duplicate of DeebotUniverse/Deebot-4-Home-Assistant#268

@edenhaus edenhaus closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Dec 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants