You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is a dubios claim at best. Everything is based on UUIDs, which do indeed have 128 bits. But some of these are version identifiers and parity checks.
Last time I checked random UUIDs had about 122 bits of randomness. Time-based and hash-based UUIDs can be rather predictable, depending on how they are generated in a particular scenario.
That said, these "128 Bit UUID Readable" strings do not alter any cryptographic properties that the underlying UUID may or may not have. So why even mention it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Readme says:
This is a dubios claim at best. Everything is based on UUIDs, which do indeed have 128 bits. But some of these are version identifiers and parity checks.
Last time I checked random UUIDs had about 122 bits of randomness. Time-based and hash-based UUIDs can be rather predictable, depending on how they are generated in a particular scenario.
That said, these "128 Bit UUID Readable" strings do not alter any cryptographic properties that the underlying UUID may or may not have. So why even mention it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: