Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

url_allowlist only works against DATABASE_URL #684

Open
dmolesUC opened this issue Apr 13, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

url_allowlist only works against DATABASE_URL #684

dmolesUC opened this issue Apr 13, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@dmolesUC
Copy link

I debated filing this against database_cleaner-active_record, but after digging in a bit I think it would need a more comprehensive fix.

I have a Rails app running in a Docker stack, where under test, the database is configured the old-fashioned way in database.yml rather than with ENV['DATABASE_URL'] -- or rather, both are supported, but if DATABASE_URL isn't set, it falls back to a hard-coded value.

test:
  url: <%= ENV['DATABASE_URL'] ||'postgres://root:root@db/framework-test?pool=5' %>

I wanted a safeguard that would work both with the Docker stack in CI, or for a developer setting up a test database locally or on some other database server, so I assumed I had to set url_allowlist. My first attempt was this lambda:

  DatabaseCleaner.url_allowlist = [
    ->(url) { URI.parse(url).path.end_with?('framework-test') }
  ]

This blows up, though, because the URL that gets passed here is ENV['DATABASE_URL'], and URI.parse(nil) fails.

My next concern was that DatabaseCleaner would truncate the database at ENV['DATABASE_URL'] (if it exists) rather than the one ActiveRecord is actually using in tests. Thankfully database_cleaner-active_record is smarter than that, and it's using the ActiveRecord connection.

But it seems like if that's how it actually works, Safeguard should somehow hook into that, rather than relying on ENV['DATABASE_URL']. Maybe instead of running once before all cleaners, it should be run per-cleaner, and the cleaner implementations should be responsible for providing the URL they're actually using?

@botandrose
Copy link
Contributor

@dmolesUC Looking at this, I completely agree with your conclusion. While the safeguard container and running logic should be in database_cleaner-core, the specific safeguards themselves should be supplied by the adapter gems. We just need to figure out how to do this in a backwards-compatible way. Want to take a stab at this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants