Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update command_order_test for new nanorc state transitions #22

Open
eflumerf opened this issue Jul 19, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Update command_order_test for new nanorc state transitions #22

eflumerf opened this issue Jul 19, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
maintenance Addresses a user request or a change in another part of the system

Comments

@eflumerf
Copy link
Member

It appears that the integration tests have mostly not been updated for the recent changes in nanorc, specifically the changes to the "standard command order" and the partition specification on the command line.
@eflumerf eflumerf added the maintenance Addresses a user request or a change in another part of the system label Jul 19, 2022
@eflumerf eflumerf self-assigned this Jul 19, 2022
@bieryAtFnal
Copy link
Contributor

They have all been updated except command_order_test...

@eflumerf eflumerf changed the title Update Integration Tests for new nanorc state transitions Update command_order_test for new nanorc state transitions Jul 19, 2022
@eflumerf
Copy link
Member Author

Updated title to better reflect reality (thanks @bieryAtFnal !)

@eflumerf
Copy link
Member Author

I'm tagging this as a CCM issue, we can chat about whether we might want this test to move to a more CCM-centric repository.

@eflumerf eflumerf removed their assignment Jul 19, 2022
@eflumerf eflumerf transferred this issue from DUNE-DAQ/dfmodules Oct 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
maintenance Addresses a user request or a change in another part of the system
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@bieryAtFnal @eflumerf