Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ACE dev_poll reactor for usage in TAO #2048

Open
akrattan opened this issue Feb 8, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

ACE dev_poll reactor for usage in TAO #2048

akrattan opened this issue Feb 8, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@akrattan
Copy link

akrattan commented Feb 8, 2023

We are using ACE/TAO FOSS 3PP for exposing the CORBA communication and currently we are using the default ORBReactorType i.e., tp (ACE_TP_Reactor).

Tp Reactor type is using the “select()” API which has the limitation on monitoring and supports file descriptor number less than 1024 only. As per the TAO documentation we have seen an another ORBReactorType “dev_poll” which doesn’t have the limitations like “tp” reactor, also “depv_poll” is supported on Linux based platforms as an experimental functionality.

Does experimental functionality is recommended by community to use for production deployments? If yes, will it be supported if there is any issue occurs? If not, can we know their release plans to deliver it for production use cases.

@jwillemsen
Copy link
Member

dev poll is still experimental for TAO, not recommended for production usage in TAO. See https://github.com/DOCGroup/ACE_TAO/wiki/ACE-and-TAO-Commercial-support for support, making dev poll fit for production in TAO is something that has to be funded by someone (or someone has to do the hard work).

@jwillemsen jwillemsen changed the title We are using ACE/TAO FOSS 3PP for exposing the CORBA communication ACE dev_poll reactor for usage in TAO Feb 8, 2023
@jwillemsen
Copy link
Member

See also #2045 and the old bugzilla http://bugzilla.dre.vanderbilt.edu/

@akrattan
Copy link
Author

akrattan commented Feb 8, 2023

If we are going with commercial support. How long do you foresee supporting this functionality for production use and if you can give some indication on commercial or pricing, it will help us to take a decision.

@jwillemsen
Copy link
Member

For commercial support please contact us directly ([email protected]) or one of the other support companies.

@pierrebizz
Copy link

Altough anecdotical, we have been testing the devpoll reactor without problems if we don't use SSL

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants