You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
xxhsum 0.8.2 outputs strange file path separator, & file hash results, on Windows
a file, provided with a path, & that path uses Windows style back slashes,
outputs strange file path separators, & file hash results, on Windows
Win7 x64
0.8.2 x64
a [file], with no path provided, xxhsum.exe xxhsum.exe
is fine
a [file], provided with a path, xxhsum.exe c:/bin/xxhsum.exe xxhsum.exe
& the path uses forward slashes, is fine
a [file], provided with a path, xxhsum.exe c:/bin\xxhsum.exe xxhsum.exe
& the path uses mixed slashes, both forward & backwards,
formats the forward slash fine, escapes, if you will, a backwards slash,
& also prefaces the hash itself with a single backslash
a [file], provided with a path, xxhsum.exe c:\bin\xxhsum.exe xxhsum.exe
& the path uses Windows style backslashes,
escapes, if you will, doubling the backwards slash,
& also prefaces the hash itself with a single backslash
the last case, Windows style back slashes, also applies to (Windows) drag&drop
& SendTo (a xxhsum.BAT batch file)
*Note: i did NOT check what happens with --check
[a /quick/ check says --check is OK with things as they are.
results do /look/ strange, but xxhsum is OK with it]
oddly, if you consider it odd, on a missing file, its' output message is "right",
xxh.check.test:32: Could not open or read 'T:\TTT\PICS\SHOW\xxhshow00.png': No such file or directory.]
xxhsum.BAT:
@echo off
cat xxhsum.BAT
echo.
xxhsum.exe %*
pause
C:\BIN>xxhsum -V
xxhsum 0.8.2 by Yann Collet
compiled as 64-bit x86_64 autoVec little endian with GCC 13.1.0
As for backslash (\), bd4ded9 has introduced md5sum style filename escape convention.
When xxhsum needs to escape the filename, it outputs \ at the beginning of the line. And put \ for every character in the path which needs to be escaped.
Therefore, from our point of view, it seems that your observations are intended outputs. But please let us know if this md5sum compatible output harms your environment / workflow.
My build & test log.
> cmd /c ver
Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.22621.1992] # Windows 11, 22H2
> cd C:\
> git clone https://github.com/Cyan4973/xxHash.git
> cd xxHash
> mkdir build
> cd build
> cmake ../cmake_unofficial -A x64
> cmake --build .
> cd Debug
> .\xxhsum.exe --version
xxhsum.exe 0.8.2 by Yann Collet
compiled as 64-bit x86_64 + SSE2 little endian with MSVC 19.36.32537.00
> .\xxhsum.exe C:/xxHash/README.md
9c871fd3096b631d C:/xxHash/README.md
> .\xxhsum.exe C:\xxHash\README.md
\9c871fd3096b631d C:\\xxHash\\README.md
Ah, md5sum sure does do that, doesn't it.
(Never saw that before.)
I'm fine with the path part, it just looks odd.
To me though, & I had never seen anything like it before, the \ at the beginning of the line, at the hash, simply looks very strange.
Anyhow, now that I understand what's going on, I'm good.
xxhsum 0.8.2 outputs strange file path separator, & file hash results, on Windows
a file, provided with a path, & that path uses Windows style back slashes,
outputs strange file path separators, & file hash results, on Windows
*Note: i did NOT check what happens with --check
[a /quick/ check says --check is OK with things as they are.
results do /look/ strange, but xxhsum is OK with it]
oddly, if you consider it odd, on a missing file, its' output message is "right",
xxh.check.test:32: Could not open or read 'T:\TTT\PICS\SHOW\xxhshow00.png': No such file or directory.]
xxhsum.BAT:
C:\BIN>xxhsum -V
xxhsum 0.8.2 by Yann Collet
compiled as 64-bit x86_64 autoVec little endian with GCC 13.1.0
C:\BIN>xxhsum xxhsum.exe
715c09679f0fbf99 xxhsum.exe
C:\BIN>xxhsum c:/bin/xxhsum.exe
715c09679f0fbf99 c:/bin/xxhsum.exe
C:\BIN>xxhsum c:/bin\xxhsum.exe
\715c09679f0fbf99 c:/bin\xxhsum.exe
C:\BIN>xxhsum c:\bin\xxhsum.exe
\715c09679f0fbf99 c:\bin\xxhsum.exe
C:\BIN>
@echo off
cat xxhsum.BAT
echo.
xxhsum.exe %*
pause
\715c09679f0fbf99 C:\BIN\xxhsum.exe
Press any key to continue . . .
https://postimg.cc/WdgqPcNY
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: