Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Design feedback on Euro-Toner #70

Open
george08 opened this issue May 6, 2013 · 0 comments
Open

Design feedback on Euro-Toner #70

george08 opened this issue May 6, 2013 · 0 comments

Comments

@george08
Copy link
Member

george08 commented May 6, 2013

Hi George,

after inspecting your toner-map, which I really like, I found the
confusing border-highway styling in diverse regions like Europe. There
are a lot of different and smaller countries than in the US with even
smaller districts. To keep the orientation on a map, at least for me, it
is crucial to see the borderlines of the countries. They are more
important than streets, because the shape of a country is more
distinguishable than its highways.

To show you an example:
at zoom levels 5 and 6 you see only borders with solid lines and no
highways. You have the shapes of the countries to keep orientation.
http://maps.stamen.com/toner/#5/48.945/-347.793
http://maps.stamen.com/toner/#6/48.262/-346.145

but as soon as you change to zoom level 7 the borders "disappear"
because the solid lines are now highways with a completely different
shape. The borders, now dashed, fade into the background and loose their
importance. They seem to be a background noise.
http://maps.stamen.com/toner/#7/48.262/-346.145

this now continues in the next zoom levels until you reach 11 or 12,
where borderlines tend to be less important.

I guess the step from zoom level 6 to 7 is the hardest, because the
solid lines change from borderline to highway. It produces the most
confusing situation. And I think that in levels 8, 9, 10 more visible
borderlines could help to keep orientation in the map.

I really like your maps, they have a stylish design and it's great that
you offer the tiles for integration in other map-services. I hope my
feedback made my point clear and helped you in developing your maps.

Keep it up!
Benjamin

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [maps.stamen.com / toner-lite]: Bug report @ 7/46.737/15.587
From: George Oates [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: 04.05.13 00:56
Hi Benjamin,

Thanks for your feedback on our cartography design at a few different zoom levels.

I'm wondering if you'd be willing to send me more precise information on what you're seeing at which zoom levels, so I can be sure I'm looking at the same thing you're commenting on?

What would be most helpful is a series of links to the various zoom levels, with an accompanying description of your thoughts…

Thanks!
george

On May 3, 2013, at 1:20 AM, [email protected] wrote:

Bug report from [email protected] (178.190.209.143):

Correction to my previous comment:

I ment highways not waterways. Sorry for the confusion.

http://maps.stamen.com/toner-lite/#7/46.737/15.587

feedback form @ http://maps.stamen.com/feedback.php?style=toner-lite

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant