Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fb/new-issue-workflow-part1 #161

Merged
merged 384 commits into from
Aug 13, 2024
Merged

fb/new-issue-workflow-part1 #161

merged 384 commits into from
Aug 13, 2024

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Merging changes from feature branch

dgor82 added 30 commits July 24, 2024 12:02
- concrete types from class to sealed records
- delete redundant interfaces
Reflecting that facilities are not trade-specific anymore
(and make consumables items a sub-type of ConsumablesIssue instead)
In preparation for logic to only show facilities active for selected sphere
- Added DomainTermJsonConverter in JsonHelper for new AvailableFacilities property
- Limited facility selections to available ones in NewIssueFacilitySelection workflow
…onstitution

This is necessary since it became a more complex record with a collection member, breaking down the default structural equality comparison for records, thereby breaking the reliance on HashSet for uniqueness in the ModelReader
This facilitates safe reflection over namespaces e.g. for trade-specific issue-type filtering in workflows
dgor82 added 27 commits August 11, 2024 18:41
…active vs. reactive workflow launchers

In the process, fix bridges repo and utility methods
…: generalised version for pro- and reactive launchers
Copy link
Contributor

@dgor82 dgor82 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Test review. Looks good to me!

@dgor82 dgor82 merged commit 0329ff6 into main Aug 13, 2024
1 check passed
@dgor82 dgor82 deleted the fb/new-issue-workflow-part1 branch August 13, 2024 06:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant