Replies: 2 comments
-
Unfortunately, we do not plan to support x86_64_v2. We have support for x86_64_v3, we want to introduce support for x86_64_v4 in the coming weeks, and we are not able to offer more - we are limited by time, human resources, money. I am very sorry that you will feel disappointed, but unfortunately fulfilling your request is not possible. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi, Also in testings with the kernel using x86-64-v2 did really not bring any big performance improvement. When I have tested this around 2 years ago, it was under 1 %, so there is really not a reason to provide it. We are focusing to provide an avx512 repository in the next month. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Greetings!
As you can see below, my CPU is set apart from v1 by having SSE4.2, F16c, and AVX. It seems it could benefit (and others with v2) by having at least an x86_64v2 compiled cachoys and cachyos-lto kernel! Other packages would be nice as well. Especially for low-end laptops and thin clients with chips like this! Brings about a massive rebirth already, even more with optimizings.
This is quite a feature distinction from x86_64v1 cores, including even the Core 2 Duo T9900 that has up to SSE4.1.
Keeping base-level support for x86_64 is of course, important too.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions