-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 208
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
antiklepto / anti-exfil protocol for Schnorr sigs #172
Comments
All I know is that @dr-orlovsky opened issue #154 for adding sign-to-contract and opened PR bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1018 with an implementaion. |
What about bitcoin-core/secp256k1#590 ? |
Yes, I had a plan to work on that, but it could take more time than I originally expected - got really overflow by all the problems during the last months since the war began. Still pan to work on it one the load will decrease - but if there will be anyone willing to work on it now - I will not object. |
#154 is a prerequisite for antiklepto - I will work on it. |
I opened a draft implementation here: bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1140 |
https://github.com/ElementsProject/secp256k1-zkp/blob/725d895fc54cf82da1c2a9c69048656405da556d/include/secp256k1_ecdsa_s2c.h#L100
Is anyone working on implementing this protocol for Schnorr signatures? Since Taproot is now active, it would be great to have this available to implement in hardware wallets.
@jonasnick @apoelstra
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: