You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This taxon appears to have not been included in the Atlas. Bob Leaney updated the account (see https://database.bsbi.org/object.php?objectid=2cd4p9h.84gq76&class=TaxonInstance), so seems to be an error on our part. Not sure that there is much we can do about this, but I'm reporting it after several email rants from Clive Stace.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As per the other errata that only affect the website, this account can presumably be included whenever we export a new set of captions to Rich. We might need to check, however, that the potetnial absence of other bits of information for this taxon doesn't break any of the displays (e.g. if this taxon was never marked for inclusion in the atlas then perhaps we do not have the altitude, phenological, and apparency information sorted?). This is not necessarily a problem, but we should check that the absence of such data results in a "pretty" failure, and not sure sort of broken display.
@kwal2@japonicus@tangiblegains to decide whether to add this taxon to the website. Assumption is that they will do whatever required to flag this taxon for inclusion within next export of data to @burkmarr
This taxon appears to have not been included in the Atlas. Bob Leaney updated the account (see https://database.bsbi.org/object.php?objectid=2cd4p9h.84gq76&class=TaxonInstance), so seems to be an error on our part. Not sure that there is much we can do about this, but I'm reporting it after several email rants from Clive Stace.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: