If a species matches against ALA data, uploaded occurrence information does not override the matching

[CorinnaPaeper]

The loading of a phylogeny and linking to ALA data appears to interfere with the displaying of user uploaded occurrence data. 

When data is loaded, some of the species are found in the ALA in the name matching process:

If a visualisation is created with the auto-detected species, it for some reason only loads distribution for two species, but neither of them are species that the ALA actually "linked" to in the above (so there is an issue of the link with the actual ALA data as well):

After uploading and selecting user occurrence data (which should override the existing ALA data), only five of the species are added to the map, even though it says it has data for 12 taxa (the right number). The five taxa where the override works on are the five that were not matched in the original name matching process.

When character data is added, the phylogeny shows the right data for all the species, but it only maps for the ones that worked for mapping:

Deleting all auto-detected species in the name-matching process does not fix the problem.