You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When a tree is uploaded, a name matching option against ALA taxonomy of all species represented in the tree is available (see screenshot below). A similar mapping functionality for uploaded occurrence data by the user would be beneficial. Currently, there is no easy mechanism for the user to check whether all species in the tree have a corresponding record in their uploaded dataset. The only way to check for gaps in the mapping (originating from e.g. omission in the dataset, misspelling) is by creating a visualisation, selecting an outer node and viewing the list of occurrence data on the map. This approach is impractical for large datasets.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When a tree is uploaded, a name matching option against ALA taxonomy of all species represented in the tree is available (see screenshot below). A similar mapping functionality for uploaded occurrence data by the user would be beneficial. Currently, there is no easy mechanism for the user to check whether all species in the tree have a corresponding record in their uploaded dataset. The only way to check for gaps in the mapping (originating from e.g. omission in the dataset, misspelling) is by creating a visualisation, selecting an outer node and viewing the list of occurrence data on the map. This approach is impractical for large datasets.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: