do we need to change how we describe const funcName = function funcName()

[tildeee]

From reading I've done in the past, technically this is an anonymous function, and it's only through interpreter convention that it looks for the assignment to a variable to try an associate a name with the function, largely to aid with debugging. We can see in other situations that (passing a new function expression as an expression to another function) that the name property will not be populated. Consider:

const pn = function(fn) { console.log(fn.name); };
pn(pn);  // prints "pn". Not standard, but everything does it 🤷 
pn(function(){});  // prints ""

Originally posted by @anselrognlie in #7 (comment)